I got curious as to just how well or poorly the 30/1.4 performs along the edges. It is certainly fairly soft there when wide open, but how about stopped down? I took the pumpkin/Halloween shot below and checked it out...
..and interestingly, it performs pretty darn well! The below samples shot at f/7.1
First, the unmolested (i.e. non-HDR processed) image.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7642b/7642bc0aaa89c41ae1f1c1c1032ebb37029c8910" alt=""
Next, a 100% crop from one side:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b4d3/4b4d313e74984d7688c5dfef55e799f2ecf91212" alt=""
Bad? Not at all! While it doesn't perform quite as admirably as my 40mm Limited, I wouldn't hesitate to use this for an overall walk-around lens. As I said in an earlier post, it's nothing to be praised resolution wise when you get near the edges/corners, but neither should you heed the advice of those who claims it's so soft the edges are just wasted and unusable...
For landscapes/architectural, you might find it lacking (there's some distortion too), but for a general purpose "normal" prime it is probably pretty ideal assuming you get a good sample.
(More)